ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2001-02811
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions).
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 6 March 2002, the Board considered and denied the applicants
request that his discharge be upgraded to general (under
honorable conditions). For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the
rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record
of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F.
In an application dated 20 June 2014, the applicant seeks
reconsideration of his earlier request. He states court-martial
proceedings were never offered and a civilian conviction is an
improper condition of a military discharge. His Vermont Army
National Guard time was never considered.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
On 8 September 2014, a request for information pertaining to his
post-service activities was forwarded to the applicant for
review and response within 30 days (Exhibit H). As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. In earlier findings, the Board determined there was
insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action. After
thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in
support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not
believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in
the previous decision. Therefore, we do not find the additional
evidence presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on
that basis. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the
applicants request.
2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2001-02811 in Executive Session on 28 May 2015, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 18 March 2002,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 20 June 2014, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 September 2014.
1
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03709
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03453 2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. In a letter dated 24 December 2008, the applicant requests reconsideration. DPSIDEP states although the evidence submitted by the applicant indicates there was only one unprofessional relationship with an enlisted member, the evaluators may have been privy to information that was not made available to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 04495
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit G. On 11 July 2014, by virtue of a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, the applicant requested reconsideration of his case to change his type of discharge. The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-02978
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. On 8 August 2003, Counsel submitted applicant’s request for reconsideration, contending that he enlisted into the Marine Corps on 29 May 1968, establishing DIEUS and TAFMSD. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAOR states that the applicant still is not providing a copy of the enlistment contract. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 01877 2
The provider diagnosed the applicant with [Major Depressive Disorder], PTSD. However, in consideration of the applicants post-service diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and PTSD, the indicators that he was experiencing significant family stressors, and his age and maturity at the time, leads the Medical Consultant to recommend an upgrade of his discharge to general (under honorable conditions) as a matter of clemency. Should the applicant provide additional evidence pertaining to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03579 3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03579 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouses record be changed to show he elected former spouse only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Addendum to the Record of Proceedings (ROP) with attachments is at Exhibit G. In a letter dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05184 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05184-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his name as XXX XXX and he be issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214. The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. On 28 February 2014, AFPC/DPSIRP issued an AF IMT 281, Notification of Change in Service Members Official...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2002-01953-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit E and G, respectively. Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 24 November 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01953 3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit E and G, respectively. Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 24 November 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.